Plant Viruses
Online
Descriptions and Lists from
the VIDE Database
Potato black
ringspot nepovirus
Index
Data collated by L.F. Salazar, 1987.
Nomenclature
Synonyms
potato calico strain of tobacco ringspot virus
(Salazar and Harrison, 1978), Andean potato calico strain of tobacco ringspot
virus (Fribourg, 1977).
Acronym
Strains
ICTV decimal code
Host range and symptoms
First reported
in Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena × S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum; from
potatoes from Huasa Huasi, Peru; by Salazar and Harrison (1977).
Natural host range and symptoms
Symptoms persist.
- Solanum tuberosum - necrotic ringspots. Potato calico strain
causes general leaf chlorosis in some cultivars, especially cv. Ticahuasi.
Transmission
Virus transmitted by mechanical inoculation;
transmitted by grafting; not transmitted by contact between plants; not
transmitted by seed.
Geographical distribution
Spreads in the
South and Central American region; Peru.
Experimental host range
Many (>9) families
susceptible.
Diagnostically susceptible host species and
symptoms
- Beta vulgaris - necrotic spots and rings;
systemic chlorotic or necrotic rings.
- Lycopersicon esculentum cv.
Kondine Red - systemic necrotic rings spots and/or line patterns.
- Cyamopsis tetragonoloba - general systemic necrosis.
- Chenopodium amaranticolor, C. quinoa - necrotic local lesions;
systemic necrosis.
- Nicotiana tabacum - systemic necrotic ringspots
and line patterns.
- Solanum tuberosum ssp. tuberosum -
necrotic spots; systemic necrotic ringspots.
- Catharanthus roseus -
chlorotic spots; systemic necrosis.
Maintenance and propagation hosts
Nicotiana clevelandii, N. tabacum cv. Samsun, N.
benthamiana.
Assay hosts (Local lesions or
Whole plants)
Chenopodium amaranticolor
(L), Chenopodium quinoa (L) and Nicotiana clevelandii (S).
Susceptible host species
Insusceptible host species
Families containing susceptible hosts
Families containing
insusceptible hosts
Sources of host-range data
Salazar
and Harrison (1978).
Physical and
biochemical properties
Properties of particles in sap
TIP:
58-60 °C (in Nicotiana clevelandii sap). LIV: 9-10 days. DEP: log10
minus 4. Infectivity of sap not changed by treatment with di-ethyl ether.
Leaf sap contains many virions. Electron microscopy: it is better to mount
virions in 1% UA.
Purification method
Salazar and
Harrison (1978).
Particle morphology
Virions isometric; not enveloped; 25
nm in diameter; angular in profile; without a conspicuous capsomere arrangement.
Physical properties
Three sedimenting components in
purified preparations; sedimentation coefficient of the fastest 117 S
(B); of the other(s) 84 S (M), or 49 S (T). A260/A280 ratio
1.97 (B), or 1.78 (M), or 1.03 (T).
Biochemical properties
Virions contain 41 % nucleic acid
(B), or 28 % nucleic acid (M), or 0 % nucleic acid (T); 59 % protein (B), or 72
% protein (M), or 100 % protein (T).
Genome consists of RNA; single-stranded. Total genome size 11.2 kb.
Genome of two parts; largest (or only) genome part the larger 7 kb; the 2nd
largest 4.2 kb. Genomic nucleic acid isolated by Salazar and Harrison (1978).
Infectivity lost when deproteinised with proteases; retained when deproteinised
with phenol or detergent.
Features of the genome
Non-genomic nucleic acid
not found in the virions.
Features of proteins
Virion protein(s) one;
Mr 59000. Method of preparation: Salazar and Harrison (1978).
Cytopathology
Virions found in mesophyll; in cytoplasm.
Inclusions absent from infected cells.
Taxonomy and
relationships
Virus(es) with serologically related virions
Tobacco ringspot and eucharis mottle viruses.
Virus(es)
with serologically unrelated virions
Arabis
mosaic, artichoke Italian latent, cacao necrosis, cherry leaf roll, grapevine
fanleaf, myrobalan latent ringspot, raspberry ringspot, strawberry latent
ringspot, tomato black ring and tomato ringspot viruses. Although the virus is
serologically distantly related to tobacco ringspot and eucharis mottle viruses,
the viruses do not cross-protect in plants and do not form recombinants; potato
black ringspot virus is, therefore, considered to be a distinct virus.
Best tests for diagnosis
Serology
is the only way to distinguish this virus from others with which it is often
naturally associated.
Comments and
References
References
- Fribourg, C.E. (1977).
Phytopathology 67: 174.
- Salazar, L.F. and Harrison, B.D.
(1977). Nature, Lond 265: 337.
- Salazar, L.F. and Harrison,
B.D. (1978b). Ann. appl. Biol. 90: 387.
- Salazar, L.F.
and Harrison, B.D. (1978). Ann. appl. Biol. 90: 375.
- Salazar,
L.F. and Harrison, B.D. (1979). CMI/AAB Descr. Pl. Viruses No. 206, 4 pp.
Cite this publication as:
Brunt, A.A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J., Watson, L. and Zurcher, E.J. (eds.)
(1996 onwards).
`Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database.
Version: 20th August 1996.' URL
http://biology.anu.edu.au/Groups/MES/vide/
Dallwitz (1980)
and
Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher (1993)
should also be cited.







Please send comments, corrections and suggestions to:
vide-manager@biology.anu.edu.au