Plant Viruses
Online
Descriptions and Lists from
the VIDE Database
Hop trefoil 2
betacryptovirus
Index
Data collated by E. Luisoni, 1991.
Nomenclature
Acronym
ICTV decimal code
Host range and symptoms
First reported
in Medicago lupulina; from Italy, in plants grown from seeds imported
from Poland and Denmark; by Boccardo et al. (1987); Luisoni et al.
(1987).
Natural host range and symptoms
- Medicago
lupulina - symptomless.
Transmission
Transmitted by means not involving a vector.
Virus not transmitted by mechanical inoculation; not transmitted by grafting;
not transmitted by contact between plants; transmitted by seed.
Geographical distribution
Found, but with no evidence of
spread, in in Italy, in plants grown from seeds from Denmark and Poland,
probably widespread elsewhere.
Experimental host range
Few (<3) families susceptible.
Maintenance and propagation hosts
Susceptible host species
Families containing susceptible hosts
Sources of host-range data
Boccardo
et al. (1987); Luisoni et al. (1987).
Physical and
biochemical properties
Properties of particles in sap
Leaf sap
contains few virions (very few). Electron microscopy: use ISEM. To aid negative
stain adhesion of purified preparations, it is best to use carbon-coated
Formvar-film that has been treated with glow-discharge in air at 0.1 torr.
Purification method
Particle morphology
Virions isometric; not enveloped; 38
nm in diameter; rounded in profile; with a conspicuous capsomere arrangement.
Biochemical properties
Genome consists of RNA;
double-stranded; linear. Total genome size 5.15 kb (pairs). Genome of three
parts (in the mixture hop trefoil cryptic viruses 2 and 3); largest (or only)
genome part the largest 2.05 kb (pairs); the 2nd largest 1.65 kb (pairs); the
3rd largest 1.45 kb (pairs). Genomic nucleic acid isolated by Boccardo et
al. (1985); Luisoni et al. (1987).
Taxonomy and
relationships
Virus(es) with serologically related virions
Red clover 2 and white clover 2 betacryptoviruses.
Additional comments on relationships
No serological relation to alphacryptoviruses.
Best tests
for diagnosis
ISEM and decoration may distinguish
between hop trefoil 2 betacryptovirus and hop trefoil 1 and 3
alphacryptoviruses. ELISA may be useful but it does not distinguish between 1, 2
and 3. The detection by PAGE of dsRNAs similar to those found for the mixture
hop trefoil cryptic viruses 2 and 3 can confirm serology.
Comments and
References
References
- Boccardo, G., Milne,
R.G., Luisoni, E., Lisa, V. and Accotto, G.P. (1985). Virology
147: 29.
- Boccardo, G., Lisa, V., Luisoni, E. and Milne, R.G. (1987).
Adv. Virus Res. 32: 171.
- Luisoni, E., Milne, R.G., Accotto,
G.P. and Boccardo, G. (1987). Intervirology 28: 144.
Cite this publication as:
Brunt, A.A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J., Watson, L. and Zurcher, E.J. (eds.)
(1996 onwards).
`Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database.
Version: 20th August 1996.' URL
http://biology.anu.edu.au/Groups/MES/vide/
Dallwitz (1980)
and
Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher (1993)
should also be cited.







Please send comments, corrections and suggestions to:
vide-manager@biology.anu.edu.au